<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TABOR for Dummies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.markhillman.com/2009/01/17/tabor-for-dummies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.markhillman.com/2009/01/17/tabor-for-dummies/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2011 19:43:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Riggs</title>
		<link>http://www.markhillman.com/2009/01/17/tabor-for-dummies/#comment-862</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Riggs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 04:55:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markhillman.com/2009/01/17/tabor-for-dummies/#comment-862</guid>
		<description>They will whine and cry about amendment 23, however nothing prevents the state from asking the districts for the money back after they have sent it out. So while they may initially have to pony up the amendment 23 money, the state will get it back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They will whine and cry about amendment 23, however nothing prevents the state from asking the districts for the money back after they have sent it out. So while they may initially have to pony up the amendment 23 money, the state will get it back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd Shepherd</title>
		<link>http://www.markhillman.com/2009/01/17/tabor-for-dummies/#comment-859</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Shepherd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 03:43:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markhillman.com/2009/01/17/tabor-for-dummies/#comment-859</guid>
		<description>Over at Coloradopols, they&#039;re saying that TABOR was built with the specific goal of doing damage.

http://coloradopols.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=8651

Also in the article titled, &quot;Slaying the TABOR Dragon,&quot; the author(s) also concede...&quot;And it&#039;s not just TABOR, but TABOR&#039;s interaction with numerous other spending mandates and limitations in the constitution that leaves lawmakers powerless to do anything besides cut when times get lean.&quot;

But of course, they make no mention of Amendment 23, which is so innocuous, it gets a free pass, and is so harmless it doesn&#039;t deserve to be mentioned by name.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over at Coloradopols, they&#8217;re saying that TABOR was built with the specific goal of doing damage.</p>
<p><a href="http://coloradopols.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=8651" rel="nofollow">http://coloradopols.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=8651</a></p>
<p>Also in the article titled, &#8220;Slaying the TABOR Dragon,&#8221; the author(s) also concede&#8230;&#8221;And it&#8217;s not just TABOR, but TABOR&#8217;s interaction with numerous other spending mandates and limitations in the constitution that leaves lawmakers powerless to do anything besides cut when times get lean.&#8221;</p>
<p>But of course, they make no mention of Amendment 23, which is so innocuous, it gets a free pass, and is so harmless it doesn&#8217;t deserve to be mentioned by name.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

