<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Mark Hillman</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.markhillman.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.markhillman.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 21:08:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Business-labor ballot deal is a lemon by &#8220;Business leaders&#8221; sell out to union extortion &#124; Independence Institute: Patient Power</title>
		<link>http://www.markhillman.com/2008/10/03/business-labor-ballot-deal-is-a-lemon/#comment-441</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8220;Business leaders&#8221; sell out to union extortion &#124; Independence Institute: Patient Power</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 02:22:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markhillman.com/2008/10/03/business-labor-ballot-deal-is-a-lemon/#comment-441</guid>
		<description>[...] Hillman explains the implications: It is understandable that business leaders didn’t want to risk passage of even one of these four [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hillman explains the implications: It is understandable that business leaders didn’t want to risk passage of even one of these four [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Udall&#8217;s U-turn on US oil by nb</title>
		<link>http://www.markhillman.com/2008/08/20/udalls-u-turn-on/#comment-117</link>
		<dc:creator>nb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 10:09:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markhillman.com/?p=260#comment-117</guid>
		<description>Then there is the NEA and their  bashing "Big Oil" as evil, and thus Schaffer as evil for supporting them. Funny that the NEA paints Schaffer as a vassal of "Big Oil" for supporting drilling (etc.), and Udall is now supporting drilling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Then there is the NEA and their  bashing &#8220;Big Oil&#8221; as evil, and thus Schaffer as evil for supporting them. Funny that the NEA paints Schaffer as a vassal of &#8220;Big Oil&#8221; for supporting drilling (etc.), and Udall is now supporting drilling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on On energy, Paris Hilton makes more sense than Ken Salazar by TM</title>
		<link>http://www.markhillman.com/2008/08/08/on-energy-paris-hilton-makes-more-sense-than-ken-salazar/#comment-83</link>
		<dc:creator>TM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 14:29:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markhillman.com/2008/08/08/on-energy-paris-hilton-makes-more-sense-than-ken-salazar/#comment-83</guid>
		<description>Absolutely loved your analogy about the teenager who refused to get a job preferring instead to spend his grandmother's gift of a saving account.  It is absolutely amazing to watch the flip flopping of the Udalls and Obamas of the world when they find themselves on the wrong side of the issue from a public sentiment fact.   I've been amazed at how they trot out solutions like the SPR which everyone agrees would have no impact to look like they are being responsive to voter concerns when they have absolutely no intention of addressing the actual problem.  

I don't more which was more amazing when Obama essentially said he lied about his opposition to NAFTA during the primaries, because he was appealing to those voters, or that the media went beyond merely ignoring Obama admitting to political pandering for votes, to actually celebrating it as showing his political astuteness reversing key positions he held in the primary in order to appeal to a different demographic in the general elections.   

This as much as anything shows the elitist mentality of the liberal elite, not only do they feel they know what is best for us, but they feel we are either so naive or ignorant that they can tell us whatever we hear in order to get elected, and then return to Washington with their agendas intact regardless of their constituents desires and values.  

America wants leadership that is sincere in their convictions, and consistent in their words, and actions.  Telling us what we want to hear, may actually work once in a short term election cycle if you have little public record to hold you accountable, but it sure is going to be heck on the reelection campaigns.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely loved your analogy about the teenager who refused to get a job preferring instead to spend his grandmother&#8217;s gift of a saving account.  It is absolutely amazing to watch the flip flopping of the Udalls and Obamas of the world when they find themselves on the wrong side of the issue from a public sentiment fact.   I&#8217;ve been amazed at how they trot out solutions like the SPR which everyone agrees would have no impact to look like they are being responsive to voter concerns when they have absolutely no intention of addressing the actual problem.  </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t more which was more amazing when Obama essentially said he lied about his opposition to NAFTA during the primaries, because he was appealing to those voters, or that the media went beyond merely ignoring Obama admitting to political pandering for votes, to actually celebrating it as showing his political astuteness reversing key positions he held in the primary in order to appeal to a different demographic in the general elections.   </p>
<p>This as much as anything shows the elitist mentality of the liberal elite, not only do they feel they know what is best for us, but they feel we are either so naive or ignorant that they can tell us whatever we hear in order to get elected, and then return to Washington with their agendas intact regardless of their constituents desires and values.  </p>
<p>America wants leadership that is sincere in their convictions, and consistent in their words, and actions.  Telling us what we want to hear, may actually work once in a short term election cycle if you have little public record to hold you accountable, but it sure is going to be heck on the reelection campaigns.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hands off Ritter&#8217;s personal cell phone by David Warren</title>
		<link>http://www.markhillman.com/2008/08/12/hands-off-ritters-personal-cell-phone/#comment-81</link>
		<dc:creator>David Warren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 11:02:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markhillman.com/2008/08/12/hands-off-ritters-personal-cell-phone/#comment-81</guid>
		<description>Spot on Mark. This sort of witch-hunting is just the reason why many good people won't run for public office. The Denver Post long ago gave up any semblance of fairness or honesty, and I hope that Govenor Ritter won't buckle to thier intimidation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spot on Mark. This sort of witch-hunting is just the reason why many good people won&#8217;t run for public office. The Denver Post long ago gave up any semblance of fairness or honesty, and I hope that Govenor Ritter won&#8217;t buckle to thier intimidation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hands off Ritter&#8217;s personal cell phone by Bryan Hagar</title>
		<link>http://www.markhillman.com/2008/08/12/hands-off-ritters-personal-cell-phone/#comment-75</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan Hagar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 16:24:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markhillman.com/2008/08/12/hands-off-ritters-personal-cell-phone/#comment-75</guid>
		<description>Mark,

You are spot on with this issue.  I hope readers of this blog will recognize how important the fundamental principal of personal responsibility in government is to good government.  Let us assume all government employees conduct themselves in a responsible manner until we are presented with evidence to the contrary.  Then, let the Denver Post and the proper authorities do their job vetting out the unscrupulous louts and removing them from their positions of public trust.  Until we are presented with evidence to the contrary, all public officials should be afforded this respect.  This way we can attract good people to government where they are so sorely needed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark,</p>
<p>You are spot on with this issue.  I hope readers of this blog will recognize how important the fundamental principal of personal responsibility in government is to good government.  Let us assume all government employees conduct themselves in a responsible manner until we are presented with evidence to the contrary.  Then, let the Denver Post and the proper authorities do their job vetting out the unscrupulous louts and removing them from their positions of public trust.  Until we are presented with evidence to the contrary, all public officials should be afforded this respect.  This way we can attract good people to government where they are so sorely needed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What would Obama fight for? by John Parmenter</title>
		<link>http://www.markhillman.com/2008/07/28/what-would-obama-fight-for/#comment-68</link>
		<dc:creator>John Parmenter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 15:33:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markhillman.com/?p=254#comment-68</guid>
		<description>This is a very well written article which I've forwarded to a number of acquaintences after reading it in this morning's Pueblo Chieftain.   President Kennedy visited West Berlin on 26 June 1963 (not 1961, as stated).   I was fortunate to be a Soldier of the U.S. Army's 1st Battle Group, 28th Infantry, 1st Infantry Division assigned to Berlin at the time of JFK's "Ich Bin Ein Berliner" visit.   My impressions are recorded at http://www.berlin-brigade.de/honor/honor14.html#john1
Keep up the good work, Mr. Hillman!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a very well written article which I&#8217;ve forwarded to a number of acquaintences after reading it in this morning&#8217;s Pueblo Chieftain.   President Kennedy visited West Berlin on 26 June 1963 (not 1961, as stated).   I was fortunate to be a Soldier of the U.S. Army&#8217;s 1st Battle Group, 28th Infantry, 1st Infantry Division assigned to Berlin at the time of JFK&#8217;s &#8220;Ich Bin Ein Berliner&#8221; visit.   My impressions are recorded at <a href="http://www.berlin-brigade.de/honor/honor14.html#john1" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('a/www.berlin-brigade.de');" rel="nofollow">http://www.berlin-brigade.de/honor/honor14.html#john1</a><br />
Keep up the good work, Mr. Hillman!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Even if gas goes to $10, Salazar says no to drilling by David Newman</title>
		<link>http://www.markhillman.com/2008/08/05/even-if-gas-goes-to-10-salazar-says-no-to-drilling/#comment-62</link>
		<dc:creator>David Newman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 10:39:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markhillman.com/2008/08/05/even-if-gas-goes-to-10-salazar-says-no-to-drilling/#comment-62</guid>
		<description>Why are the democrats reprising the Jimmy Carter "we must all share in the suffering" mentality?  Why must there be no hope in sight?  What is next, Gulags in Nevada where the nuclear waste should be buried?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why are the democrats reprising the Jimmy Carter &#8220;we must all share in the suffering&#8221; mentality?  Why must there be no hope in sight?  What is next, Gulags in Nevada where the nuclear waste should be buried?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Even if gas goes to $10, Salazar says no to drilling by G. Young</title>
		<link>http://www.markhillman.com/2008/08/05/even-if-gas-goes-to-10-salazar-says-no-to-drilling/#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator>G. Young</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 01:08:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markhillman.com/2008/08/05/even-if-gas-goes-to-10-salazar-says-no-to-drilling/#comment-56</guid>
		<description>You get what you pay for. We elected this moron and now we are paying the price. If this is the best representation we have in Colorado, we are in deep trouble.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You get what you pay for. We elected this moron and now we are paying the price. If this is the best representation we have in Colorado, we are in deep trouble.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ritter&#8217;s act wears thin with Coloradans by G. Young</title>
		<link>http://www.markhillman.com/2008/07/23/ritters-act-wears-thin-with-coloradans/#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator>G. Young</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 01:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markhillman.com/2008/07/23/ritters-act-wears-thin-with-coloradans/#comment-55</guid>
		<description>Very good article. Exposing our lousy Governor is always a good thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very good article. Exposing our lousy Governor is always a good thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What would Obama fight for? by Kory Nelson</title>
		<link>http://www.markhillman.com/2008/07/28/what-would-obama-fight-for/#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>Kory Nelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 09:40:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markhillman.com/?p=254#comment-53</guid>
		<description>As a U.S. Army veteran who was assigned to the 3rd Battalion of the 6th Infantry Regiment in West Berlin, Germany during the Cold War (1981-83), I could not agree more with Mr. Hillman's article - well said, Sir!

Obama did not speak in front of the Brandenburg Gate, but the Victory Column (German: Siegessäule) -- designed by Heinrich Strack after 1864 to commemorate the Prussian victory in the Danish-Prussian War, by the time it was inaugurated on 2 September 1873, Prussia had also defeated Austria in the Austro-Prussian War (1866) and France in the Franco-Prussian War (1870–71), giving the statue a new purpose. Different from the original plans, these later victories in the so-called Unification Wars inspired the addition of the bronze sculpture of Victoria, 8.3 meters high and weighing 35 tonnes, designed by Friedrich Drake. Berliners, with their fondness for giving nicknames to famous buildings, call the statue Goldelse, meaning something like "Golden Lizzy".

The column itself consists of four solid blocks of sandstone, three of which are decorated by cannon barrels captured from the enemies of the aforementioned three wars. The fourth ring is decorated with golden garlands and was added in 1938–39 when the column was moved to its present location. The relief decoration had to be removed at the request of the French forces in 1945, probably to prevent Germans from being reminded of former victories, especially the defeat of the French in 1871. It was restored for the 750th anniversary of Berlin in 1987 by the French president at that time, François Mitterrand. 

 That location symbolizes issues regarding victory in times of great struggle through the use of military strength and determination - quite ironic given Obama's speech catering to the fascist liberals of Europe.

Barely five minutes before the speech was supposed to start, ZDF Berlin studio chief Peter Frey added, "We do estimate that 20,000 [literally, "a couple of ten thousand"] people have turned out." Frey's tone reflected the gap between the relatively modest number cited and the lofty predictions that had preceded the event. 

During the Cold War, the American, British, and French military forces stationed in West Berlin would hold a parade in Berlin every year, marking the end of WWII. We marched down through the Großer Stern (Great Star), a large intersection on the city axis that leads from the former Berliner Stadtschloss (Berlin City Palace) through the Brandenburg Gate to the western parts of the city. 

If any place in Berlin speaks to the legitmate use of military force as a legitimate tool for the extension of state power, the Victory Column would do it. The photos of Obama's speech clearly shows that only the narrow street filled with people, with gaps - so the 20,000 estimate is more credible.

Thanks again, Mr. Hillman, for a great article!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a U.S. Army veteran who was assigned to the 3rd Battalion of the 6th Infantry Regiment in West Berlin, Germany during the Cold War (1981-83), I could not agree more with Mr. Hillman&#8217;s article - well said, Sir!</p>
<p>Obama did not speak in front of the Brandenburg Gate, but the Victory Column (German: Siegessäule) &#8212; designed by Heinrich Strack after 1864 to commemorate the Prussian victory in the Danish-Prussian War, by the time it was inaugurated on 2 September 1873, Prussia had also defeated Austria in the Austro-Prussian War (1866) and France in the Franco-Prussian War (1870–71), giving the statue a new purpose. Different from the original plans, these later victories in the so-called Unification Wars inspired the addition of the bronze sculpture of Victoria, 8.3 meters high and weighing 35 tonnes, designed by Friedrich Drake. Berliners, with their fondness for giving nicknames to famous buildings, call the statue Goldelse, meaning something like &#8220;Golden Lizzy&#8221;.</p>
<p>The column itself consists of four solid blocks of sandstone, three of which are decorated by cannon barrels captured from the enemies of the aforementioned three wars. The fourth ring is decorated with golden garlands and was added in 1938–39 when the column was moved to its present location. The relief decoration had to be removed at the request of the French forces in 1945, probably to prevent Germans from being reminded of former victories, especially the defeat of the French in 1871. It was restored for the 750th anniversary of Berlin in 1987 by the French president at that time, François Mitterrand. </p>
<p> That location symbolizes issues regarding victory in times of great struggle through the use of military strength and determination - quite ironic given Obama&#8217;s speech catering to the fascist liberals of Europe.</p>
<p>Barely five minutes before the speech was supposed to start, ZDF Berlin studio chief Peter Frey added, &#8220;We do estimate that 20,000 [literally, "a couple of ten thousand"] people have turned out.&#8221; Frey&#8217;s tone reflected the gap between the relatively modest number cited and the lofty predictions that had preceded the event. </p>
<p>During the Cold War, the American, British, and French military forces stationed in West Berlin would hold a parade in Berlin every year, marking the end of WWII. We marched down through the Großer Stern (Great Star), a large intersection on the city axis that leads from the former Berliner Stadtschloss (Berlin City Palace) through the Brandenburg Gate to the western parts of the city. </p>
<p>If any place in Berlin speaks to the legitmate use of military force as a legitimate tool for the extension of state power, the Victory Column would do it. The photos of Obama&#8217;s speech clearly shows that only the narrow street filled with people, with gaps - so the 20,000 estimate is more credible.</p>
<p>Thanks again, Mr. Hillman, for a great article!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
